I agree with aniket that the members found useful info in Dan's posts and hence supported him. I also agree with ashok that the original author should have been acknowledged. It's good for everyone, including this website.
Well Dan, it doesn't take much to acknowledge Timothy's name, does it? A half line.. just a link..
Well Dan, it doesn't take much to acknowledge Timothy's name, does it? A half line.. just a link..
Well, thanks for deriving the just the WRONG conclusion from my post.
You are making a generalization, distortion of the statement.
I ABHOR the idiotic support for him, for whatever reasons. That is the centerline.
My post says it's wrong to support him. If you want to agree/disagree, agree/disagree with this point. DO NOT BE SELECTIVE.
THIS IDIOTIC SUPPORT IS GOING TO KILL THE FORUM, in the longer run. AND, one must be a noob, not to understand this.
( I am beginning to use more and more capital letters, as people tend to ignore what is written in small caps )