Ok. Anant.
Now you can go for exploration.
BUT
In exploration, like u have seen in the above chart there are 3 NR7 in a row, if any multiple instances of any ID, IDNRx or NRx can be mentioned then it would be "sone pe suhaga".
This multiple NRx can be marked as xNR4 or xNR7 or xIDNRy ...
Now awaiting the AFL.
Murtaza
Hi Murtaza Bahi and AW10,
I have made the AFL to show multi NRx and IDNRX etc. I have a small doubt:
As you know, NR7 is also NR4, therefore, a NR4 and NR7 adjacent to each other (the order is no important) will make a 2NR4 and a simple NR7. similar is the case with combinations of IDNRx, ID etc. In such situations whether they should be considered as multiple NRx? Or should we take each category separately? What I mean is a 2NR4 is only when two NR4 are together and not a NR7 and NR4. Similarly, IDNR7 together with NR7 is NOT multi NR7, a IDNRx with ID is not multi ID etc.
If we label the bars with xNRy etc it will be too cluttered. The bars will continue to show the number 4, 7 etc even for multi NR set up. But in Title it can be shown as xNRy or xIDNRy or xID etc. In Exploration table no problem. We can have separate columns for single NRx and multi NRx.
Just waiting for your feed back.
-Anant