a1a1a1, it's been 8 months since the op posted. That is why the thread went dead.
If he starts posting again, this thread will be resurrected.
In response to your comment, let me say something, and you tell me what you think.
Even the best of methodologies, will not find the exit with absolute uncanny accuracy. Would it not be up to the traders to make adjustments as the trade progresses? Would the methodology not be considered successful if it was entered based on its parameters? As long as the points or pips are positive, is it still not a good trade?
This is also my gut feeling. A methodology cannot be taken as one to trade by until it becomes a convictional part of the trader. You can't trade a methodology based on here say, yet, if you never adapt it as your own, there are still maybe some lessons that could be learned.
Just sharing some thoughts. I'd like to hear your views.
Hello Sanjoy,
Don't wan't to sound just critical even cynical. But friend any system that can give profit consistently wouldn't be so open ended with so obscure Exits. I've emphasized before also that This is a Negative Expectancy system..people might get excited on seeing a good result in the short term (like a month or two) but that in sense guarantee the future results.
This system simply trades an Oscillator on breaking the high of previous candle. All other parts of the system are subjective..time of trading pairs..exits...frames..profit targets...this way this is not a system just a bundle of theories..that's why its gone dead...
Thanks
