I have been with Master Trust since the days they started their ATS efforts. That would be nearly two years. A long wait, but I accept it was unavoidable on their part.
Initially they offered me one plugin (?) called OrderPlacer which would take orders from my afl for execution. It was free which was nice of them. It was not bad as a first effort but had a few downsides and it was probably at this point of time that they started doing something about a more robust version called a COM API (?).
Well, when it was finally out I immediately subscribed to it as one of the first few takers. It was about 3-4 months back, and I don't regret it.
It has undergone some modifications in these months and now looks stable and is working fine. If this week passes off without a bad incident I can say it has passed the test.
They are providing data for free (saves on the Rs. 2k odd per month gdfl data which I have been paying all the while). The second/tick level data are not that consistent, but it isn't a big issue either.
I wonder if Master Trust really aims to becoming the country leader in ATS. Their product is the cheapest in India, I guess; quality wise they should be nearly at par with the best ones in India. So what's stopping them to get more aggressive?
To become the leaders, they need to keep a 24x7 team working for upgrades/repairs/modifications. They should come up with a feedback window within MT3.0 page itself and address reports promptly. Six months in this mode will put them at the top.
That includes hosting at their server, the next obvious step. I suspect it is at the infancy. Here also, they must aim for an UNATTENDED hosting with auto recovery/shutdown from power, internet, data, software and hardware crashes keeping the trader in the loop. This way the trader don't have to kill his eyes and bones staring at the screen 14 hours a day. After all, we trade for becoming free, don't we?
Initially they offered me one plugin (?) called OrderPlacer which would take orders from my afl for execution. It was free which was nice of them. It was not bad as a first effort but had a few downsides and it was probably at this point of time that they started doing something about a more robust version called a COM API (?).
Well, when it was finally out I immediately subscribed to it as one of the first few takers. It was about 3-4 months back, and I don't regret it.
It has undergone some modifications in these months and now looks stable and is working fine. If this week passes off without a bad incident I can say it has passed the test.
They are providing data for free (saves on the Rs. 2k odd per month gdfl data which I have been paying all the while). The second/tick level data are not that consistent, but it isn't a big issue either.
I wonder if Master Trust really aims to becoming the country leader in ATS. Their product is the cheapest in India, I guess; quality wise they should be nearly at par with the best ones in India. So what's stopping them to get more aggressive?
To become the leaders, they need to keep a 24x7 team working for upgrades/repairs/modifications. They should come up with a feedback window within MT3.0 page itself and address reports promptly. Six months in this mode will put them at the top.
That includes hosting at their server, the next obvious step. I suspect it is at the infancy. Here also, they must aim for an UNATTENDED hosting with auto recovery/shutdown from power, internet, data, software and hardware crashes keeping the trader in the loop. This way the trader don't have to kill his eyes and bones staring at the screen 14 hours a day. After all, we trade for becoming free, don't we?
thanks for our valuable reply
u used my 3.0 nowadays
what is our opinion about master trader 3.0
thanks