Lets have a look at a case where the Short Strangle worked out and whether the extra leg weighs us down somehow.
Date 21/12/2011
Spot 4693
Shorted: 4800 CE and 4600 PE
Price progression till expiry, WITHOUT the extra leg
69.35
65.25
46.45
44.2
22.7
8.9
Now with the extra protective leg of 4500 PE
53.65
56.4
39.1
42.3
21.2
8.05
No major changes. Meaning, both ways the extra protective leg only benefits. Since, we are in the business of reducing risk, this extra leg makes enormous sense.
What remains to be seen, is the risk we are exposed to when price breaks out against the direction of the protective leg.
Date 21/12/2011
Spot 4693
Shorted: 4800 CE and 4600 PE
Price progression till expiry, WITHOUT the extra leg
69.35
65.25
46.45
44.2
22.7
8.9
Now with the extra protective leg of 4500 PE
53.65
56.4
39.1
42.3
21.2
8.05
No major changes. Meaning, both ways the extra protective leg only benefits. Since, we are in the business of reducing risk, this extra leg makes enormous sense.
What remains to be seen, is the risk we are exposed to when price breaks out against the direction of the protective leg.