I do not intend to be patronizing. Am just trying to present a logical point of view.
See, I am an ordinary man; just a one man army. If I could earn 30% a month without seeing any loss, then imagine what a corporation could do! Corporations, with massive computers, with geniuses on their pay-rolls. They'd saturate that concept in matter of seconds.
Point is. In the stock market, there is always a loss, and most definitely there is always a draw-down. Theoretically, one could argue that if delta gets adjusted then all is fine... but theory is only the first step into reality.
A suggestion: If you do not have 10 to 15 years of hardcore experience in the stock markets, then do not go for advanced methods of deploying cash. Markets will wolf it down in a matter of days. Save this money.
See, I am an ordinary man; just a one man army. If I could earn 30% a month without seeing any loss, then imagine what a corporation could do! Corporations, with massive computers, with geniuses on their pay-rolls. They'd saturate that concept in matter of seconds.
Point is. In the stock market, there is always a loss, and most definitely there is always a draw-down. Theoretically, one could argue that if delta gets adjusted then all is fine... but theory is only the first step into reality.
A suggestion: If you do not have 10 to 15 years of hardcore experience in the stock markets, then do not go for advanced methods of deploying cash. Markets will wolf it down in a matter of days. Save this money.
However what you have missed is that 30% is per annum (yearly) and not monthly. Hope now all will be easy and clear
Regards,